An Argument for the Use of Due :: essays papers

An Argument for the Use of Due Due to a insufficiency of attention or understanding of English grammar, many Americans have, for several generations, used the adjective due as part of a prepositional phrase to hold in adverbial elements- to the disapproval of some strict grammarians. Although I prefer their prescription, for reasons of style, I must oppose their claim to correctness, on the pragmatic grounds of logic and sensibility. The nearly shakily grounded argument against the adverbial use is one of etiquette or style. Wilson Follett considers this use as poor workmanship which is loose and lawless....rare in writers other than those who take improvement of every latitude. (Follett). H. W. Fowler also reveals a negative bias in his statement that due to is often used by illiterates ( Qtd. in Morris). But, as Bergen Evans said, it is used to incline a verb millions of times every day. And it is used in this way in very respectable places. So, if we are to devise and enforce laws of grammar based on exercise by a particular social class or the preference of some who disapprove of its workmanship-who I might add are a minority-then we should maneuver our pencils, and prepare our oratories, for the battle weve begun hardly ends with this issue and is certain to be long and arduous. A second argument, best stated by Follett, that not every face is right by virtue of its existence, appears to highlight the noble defense of language from the deterioration caused by uneducated and uncouth use. If this were the case here, I would heartily hail Follett and Fowler for their defense. But it is not the case. For example, engraved tablets adorning the Philadelphia state house read, Here sat the Continental Congress...except when...it sat in Baltimore, and in...Lancaster and in...York, due to the temporary occupation of Philadelphia by the British army. (Qtd. In Evans). And in 1957 Queen Elizabeth II opened her addressed of the Canadian parlimen t with, Due to inability to market their grain, prairie farmers have been faced for some time with a shortage of sums... (qtd. In Morris). The wide spread, public and formal use of due to for adverbial elements hardly qualifies it as uneducated or uncouth and actually contradicts the rendering of locution. In fact, if precise usage is the issue, I think it would be more accurate to call the grammarians substitution of other phrases in adverbial uses a locution.